Istio's Sidecar Architecture and integration with Envoy
12
Linkerd 10 Node Agent/Sidecar Architecture
13
Linkerd2 Sidecar Architecture
14
Consul Node Agent Architecture
15
Aspen Mesh Sidecar Architecture and integration with Istio
16
Kong Enterprise Monolith, Microservice Service Mesh
17
AWS APP MESH Sidecar Architecture and Integration with Envoy
18
Linkerdland Linkerd 2 Feature Comparative Data
19
Some Service Mesh Feature Comparative Data Continued
20
Most Service Meshes use Prometheus with Grafana
21
Some Service Mesh Performance Factors
22
Some Service Mesh Comparative Performance Data
23
Load Balancer Requests-per-Second
24
Load Balancer Latency and Concurrency
25
Load Balancer CPU and Latency and Concurrency Performance Data - Disagreement
26
Hot Off the Press Testing - Linkerd2 vs Istio
27
Service Meshes Architecture Pros and Cons
28
Service Mesh Comparison Final Thoughts
Description:
Explore a comprehensive comparison of current service mesh architectures in this informative conference talk. Delve into the differences between various service meshes and their components, including Envoy, Istio, Conduit, Linkerd, Kong, Aspen, and Consul. Gain insights into container orchestrators, API gateways, and client-side libraries service mesh methodologies. Learn about the key benefits and capabilities of service meshes, focusing on visibility, traffic management, resiliency, and security control for distributed application services. Examine different service mesh architectures, such as library, node agent, and sidecar, and understand their pros and cons. Compare features, performance factors, and benchmarks of popular service mesh offerings for Kubernetes and Mesos. Analyze load balancer performance data, including requests-per-second, latency, concurrency, and CPU usage. Discover recent testing results comparing Linkerd2 and Istio. Conclude with final thoughts on selecting the most suitable service mesh for different workloads.
Read more