Главная
Study mode:
on
1
Intro
2
Matchings between diagrams
3
Bottleneck distance distance
4
The main contenders
5
Coordinates have separate meanings
6
An example with height functions
7
An example with point clouds
8
Recall: Sublevel sets of functions on simplicial complexes
9
Local Stability for functions on simplicial complexes
10
Interleaving distance
11
The p-norm of a persistence module
12
Morphisms between persistence diagrams
13
Example with persistence modules of a single interval
14
Constructing a span from a matching
15
Spans for the bottleneck distance - matching the diagonal
16
Mean as minimiser of sum of distances squared
17
Candidates for the Mean
18
Candidates for the Median
19
Median of a selection - q=p=1
20
A case for change - replace
21
Lipschitz stability corollaries
Description:
Explore a comprehensive lecture on the importance of using q=p in the Wasserstein distance between persistence diagrams. Delve into five key reasons supporting this choice, including improved formula simplicity, better local geometry reflection, natural stability results, algebraic version definition for persistence modules, and easier computation of central tendencies. Examine various examples, including height functions and point clouds, to illustrate the concepts. Investigate topics such as matchings between diagrams, bottleneck distance, sublevel sets of functions on simplicial complexes, and interleaving distance. Learn about the p-norm of a persistence module, morphisms between persistence diagrams, and the construction of spans from matchings. Analyze the mean as a minimizer of the sum of distances squared and explore candidates for mean and median calculations. Gain insights into Lipschitz stability corollaries and understand the case for adopting q=p in the Wasserstein distance formula. Read more

Why Should Q=P in the Wasserstein Distance Between Persistence Diagrams?

Applied Algebraic Topology Network
Add to list
0:00 / 0:00