Главная
Study mode:
on
1
Introduction
2
Outline
3
Davis V Bandemer
4
What followed
5
Vieth v Biller
6
LULAC v Perry
7
Political Parties
8
The Basic Problem
9
An Opening for Social Science
10
A Challenge for the Courts
11
Symmetry
12
The Counterfactual
13
The drunkards search
14
Thresholds
15
Kennedys concerns
16
Symmetry standard
17
Efficiency gap
18
Advantages of the efficiency gap
19
Bias and media indifference
20
When is too much
21
Advantages
22
Unhappy surprises
23
The efficiency gap
24
Blowout phenomenon
25
Computer simulations
26
Political neutrality
27
Where did this all get us
28
Background of the case
29
Results of the case
30
The plaintiffs expert witness
31
Results of simulations
32
Culture clash
33
Roberts manonthestreet
34
Where do we go next
35
Will there be a winning metric
36
Other reform efforts
37
Counterfactuals
Description:
Explore a Stanford seminar on partisan gerrymandering and its implications for the U.S. Supreme Court, focusing on the role of social science in legal proceedings. Delve into the background of the Gill v Whitford case, examining various metrics proposed for measuring gerrymandering, including the efficiency gap. Learn from Eric McGhee, the inventor of the efficiency gap measure, as he discusses the legal context, analyzes different approaches to quantifying gerrymandering, and reflects on how social science research influences litigation. Gain insights into the challenges faced by the Supreme Court in establishing constitutional constraints on partisan redistricting, and understand the potential impact of this case on American politics. Discover the complexities of electoral reform, legislative behavior, and the intersection of political science and law in this comprehensive examination of a critical issue in contemporary U.S. democracy.

Stanford Seminar - Partisan Gerrymandering and the Supreme Court: The Role of Social Science

Stanford University
Add to list
0:00 / 0:00