Главная
Study mode:
on
1
Introduction
2
Project Overview
3
Case Scenario
4
Algorithmic Monoculture
5
Same Data Sets
6
Data Sets
7
Foundation Models
8
Name Artifacts
9
Name Sentiment
10
Question
11
Key Findings
12
Systemic Failure
13
Formalizing the Metric
14
Looking at Census Records
15
Facial Recognition Data
16
Ethical Dimension
17
Is there a tradeoff
18
Is this discrimination
19
Federally protected categories
20
Homogenation and bias
21
Fairness gerrymandering
22
Contractualism
23
Effect on Democracy
24
Effect on Autonomy
25
Threshold
26
Wallser
27
Conclusion
28
Questions
29
Discrimination
30
Application
31
Risks
Description:
Explore the ethical implications of algorithmic monoculture in high-stakes decision-making processes. Delve into Kathleen Creel's lecture from Stanford University, which examines how using the same machine learning model across various settings can amplify biases and lead to consistent mistreatment of individuals. Learn about the formalization of outcome homogenization, experiments conducted on US census data, and the ethical arguments surrounding this phenomenon. Gain insights into the potential consequences for democracy, autonomy, and fairness, as well as the concept of fairness gerrymandering. Understand the risks associated with shared training data and foundation models, and consider the broader implications for algorithmic decision-making in society.

Picking on the Same Person - Does Algorithmic Monoculture Homogenize Outcomes?

Stanford University
Add to list
0:00 / 0:00